Psychology of design: Navigating the Human Element in Product Innovation
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The essence of Don Norman’s ‘The Design of Everyday Things’ remains crucial today, illustrating the ongoing challenges users face with modern, often non-intuitive designs. It emphasizes the need for user-centric approaches in creating products that are accessible and user-friendly.
To address the disconnect between innovative design and user experience, a holistic ‘Psychology of Design’ (PoD) approach is essential, integrating psychological principles and methodologies to understand and cater to user interactions, perceptions, and preferences more effectively.
This approach involves a strategic action plan focusing on sensitizing designers to consumer psychology, embedding psychological theories into the design process, and utilizing valid psychological research methods to gather meaningful data on user experiences. By doing so, we can ensure the development of products that are not only advanced but also intuitive and well-received, enhancing user satisfaction and product success.
Key Takeaways:
Design Evolution: Design principles and aesthetics are not static; they evolve, reflecting changes in societal preferences, technological advancements, and the prevailing Zeitgeist.
User-Centric Approach: Despite advancements, many designs still lack a user-centric approach, leading to products that are often misunderstood or misused by consumers.
Multisensory Integration: The integration of multisensory elements in design can lead to richer user experiences and enhanced product interaction, going beyond visual appeal to create more intuitive and pleasurable products.
Contextual Design: The context in which a product is placed significantly influences its meaning and interpretation; understanding this can lead to more coherent and aesthetically pleasing designs.
Product Personality: Products, like humans, have personalities, and creating a consistent product personality can lead to enduring loyalty and stronger consumer-product relationships.
Gestalt Perception: A coherent and holistic design, or Gestalt, is more impactful and aesthetically appealing, signaling unity and consistency and directing attention effectively.
A New Paradigm in Design: Embracing the Psychological Turn
In the realm of design, where aesthetics and functionality intertwine, the essence of humanity and its psychological intricacies often remain overlooked. The ‘Psychology of Design’ (PoD) emerges as a beacon, illuminating the path to products that resonate with the human psyche, fostering creations that are not only embraced but cherished.
The Human-Centric Approach
The evolution of design is a testament to the pursuit of addressing human needs, with human-centered design (HCD) standing as the established methodology. It’s a logical approach, aiming to resolve the myriad of challenges designers face, from usability to sustainability. However, the true essence of HCD seems to be lost in translation in everyday design practices, often reduced to a buzzword, and its implementation is frequently superficial, lacking a foundational understanding of psychology.
The Essence of Psychology in Design
The psychological turn in design is not a mere incorporation of psychological insights; it is a commitment to applying profound psychological, anthropological, and cognitive science knowledge to design practices. This approach demands a foundational integration of the latest psychological theories into design theory, application, and practice, transcending the superficial application of psychological advice and rules of thumb.
Perception and Reality in Design
The subjectivity of human perception is a crucial consideration in design.
A design item is not just an object with objective properties; it becomes a subject of individual construal and subjective perception. For instance, the color and form of a product are interpreted through cognitive pre-processing, and these interpretations can be modulated by context, expectation, and knowledge. Understanding this active, hypothesis-driven process of perception is crucial for creating designs that align with human experiences and expectations.
Predictive Nature of Perception
Our cognitive apparatus is not just processing the external world; it’s constantly generating predictions, preparing action plans, and updating mental models to cope with the dynamic, ever-changing environment. Understanding this predictive nature of human cognition is essential to address one of the significant challenges in design: human error.
Poorly designed items, which do not consider human cognitive functioning, provoke prediction errors leading to inefficient or erroneous usage and unsatisfactory experiences.
Figure 1. Illustration of facets that have to be considered for successfully initiating a psychological turn in design theory towards a framework for Psychology of Design (PoD). Most importantly, the human who is confronted with a designed product captures and interprets the outer world, so also the design, via (multisensory) perceptual processes which are strongly modulated by associations and analogies. These are formed and further shaped by several factors such as personality factors as well as social and general context that are, in turn, both influenced by Zeitgeist and thus potentially dynamic. So, the affordances provided by the designed product are not general, but they depend on person and context or situation. This also implies that the Gestalt which emerges from these affordances is beyond any part-based, analytical and objective description of the physical nature of the product.
A Journey Through the Psychological and Contextual Tapestry of Automotive Design
In the realm of design, particularly in the automotive sector, the essence of creating products that resonate with consumers is deeply intertwined with understanding the psychological and contextual nuances of design.
Embracing Change in Design
Design is never static; it’s a dynamic entity, evolving with societal shifts and technological advancements. The ‘Zeitgeist’ or the spirit of the time, molds new design interpretations and opportunities. A design that doesn’t innovate becomes a relic, appreciated only out of habit. Recognizing the cognitive mechanisms related to change is crucial to shaping the future of design, where the context and
the Zeitgeist play pivotal roles in determining design relevance and acceptance.
Contextualizing Design
Design is not an isolated entity; it’s deeply embedded within its context, interacting and being interpreted within it. The meaning and essence of design are modulated by its context. A luxurious car with a huge carbon footprint may not be admired at a conference on renewable energies.
Context is not just the physical surrounding but also a psychological reality, shaping consistent aesthetics and perceived quality.
Designing with Personality
In today’s competitive markets, design expresses more than functionality; it conveys the ideas or the lifestyle a product represents, creating a personality for the product. This personality enables consumers to predict how the product will ‘behave’ in different situations and usage scenarios, making the product more predictable, ‘reliable’, and relatable.
The Power of Analogies in Design
Analogies play a crucial role in perceiving, learning, adapting, and using products. They help in creating products that consumers use more intuitively and with a more pleasurable experience. For instance, the introduction of hand gestures in smartphones was a design by analogy to our handling in the analogue world, making digital handling more intuitive and user-friendly.
Multisensory Integration in Design
Design is not just a visual experience; it’s a multisensory integration providing richer and holistic product experiences.
This integration not only allows for improved usability and increased safety but also deepens the emotional link to a product and the intuitive understanding of its functionality. A multisensory view in design helps in going beyond the ‘visual empire’ by integrating other senses to assist the aesthetic experience and the natural way of handling the design of products.
The Essence of Gestalt in Design
Designs represent holistic entities, and the sum of their parts does not equal the final design. A Gestalt inherently signals unity and consistency, automatically directing attention and creating aesthetic appeal. Understanding and applying the principles of Gestalt in design is crucial to creating coherent, aesthetically pleasing, and successful designs in a holistic way.
Designing for the Human Experience
In the intricate world of design, the echoes of Donald Norman’s seminal work, ‘The Design of Everyday Things,’ still reverberate, highlighting the persistent challenges in user interaction and experience. Norman’s work, a beacon in the design world, emphasized the psychological aspects of user interaction, shedding light on the frequent disconnect between design and user understanding, usability, and enjoyment.
Despite the advancements in technology and design, users still grapple with products that seem to neglect the fundamental principles of interaction.
For instance, the myriad of programs in modern washing machines often leaves users baffled, restricting the actual usage to a few basic functions. Similarly, the touch screens in cars, while visually pleasing, often lack intuitive interaction, leaving users yearning for tangible feedback.
Norman’s principles, despite being widely acknowledged and revered, seem to be lost in translation when it comes to practical application. The prevalence of design flaws in modern products underscores the lack of consequential application of human-centered design principles from the inception of the design process. The essence of creating user-friendly products seems to be overshadowed by the overwhelming influx of functions and controls, leading to a high probability of design errors.
The crux of the matter lies in the integration of psychology into the framework of design. Without understanding the psychological underpinnings of user interaction and experience, the design world will continue to witness a chasm between products and their human users. The essence of creating products that resonate with humans necessitates a shift towards a ‘Psychology of Design’ approach, where psychological theories and principles form the backbone of the design process.
Action Plan for Integrating Psychology in Design:
Sensitizing: Recognizing that consumers are humans and understanding their thinking requires a solid psychological approach as the foundation.
Data Informed by Theory: Leveraging psychological knowledge requires delving into the basic theories of human psychology, which form the pillars of psychological thinking, rather than solely relying on applied psychology articles.
Theory Informed by Data: To truly understand consumer thinking and behavior, there is a need for psychologically valid data on design experience, necessitating the adaptation and application of established psychological research methods that provide ecologically valid measures through adequate experimental designs.
Conclusions
The exploration of design, particularly in the automotive sector, reveals a complex interplay between aesthetics, functionality, user interaction, and psychological underpinnings.
The enduring relevance of Donald Norman’s principles from ‘The Design of Everyday Things’ underscores the persistent challenges and opportunities in aligning design with user understanding, usability, and enjoyment.
Despite technological advancements, there exists a discernible gap between design intent and user experience, often due to a neglect of fundamental interaction principles and a lack of intuitive, human-centered design approaches.
The myriad of complexities in modern products, from washing machines to car touch screens, often leaves users baffled and yearning for more intuitive interactions. The prevalence of such design flaws highlights the crucial need for a more consequential application of human-centered design principles from the inception of the design process. The overwhelming influx of functions and controls in modern products often overshadows the essence of creating user-friendly, resonant products, leading to a high probability of design errors and a disconnect between products and their human users.
The integration of psychology into the design framework is paramount. A deeper understanding of the psychological underpinnings of user interaction and experience is essential to bridge the existing chasm between products and users. A shift towards a ‘Psychology of Design’ approach is imperative, where psychological theories and principles form the backbone of the design process, ensuring the creation of products that truly resonate with humans. This approach necessitates a holistic understanding of consumers as humans, a solid foundation in psychological theories, and the adaptation and application of established psychological research methods to provide ecologically valid measures through adequate experimental designs.
Disclaimer: This Future Insight is the adaptation of the original research art
About this paper:
Carbon, C. (2019). Psychology of Design. Design Science, 5, E26. doi:10.1017/dsj.2019.25
.